Wipes
A pared-back formula and plastic-free cloth make this an appealing everyday wipe. It is relatively easy to find, but costs more than budget options. Moisture and cleaning feedback are encouraging; one-handed dispensing can still be the sticking point.
What these scores mean and how we assess them
Five disclosed ingredients and fragrance-free positioning. Midwife use and hypoallergenic wording are not independent chemical certifications.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Accessible product-level independent PFAS test/certificate.
Obtain exact-product evidence for PFAS absence / testing.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
TCF/no chlorine with clear evidence.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Chlorine and bleaching process.
Fragrance assessment uses the exact range or explicit variant limitation.
Complete formula plus explicit absence or independently verified absence.
Drying-alcohol assessment distinguishes ethanol/isopropanol from other ingredients with alcohol in their name.
Independently verified absence or complete formulation/material list plus explicit alcohol-free claim.
Assessed from current formula or explicit declaration.
Complete formula or independently verified absence.
Assessed from current formula; presence alone is not a clinical risk conclusion.
Complete formula and explicit phenoxyethanol absence, or product testing covers phenols.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Product/residue testing or robust certified organic coverage.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Pesticide residue risk in plant-derived inputs.
Formula/declaration evidence is separate from analytical testing.
Accessible testing/certification plus absence.
Formula disclosure does not certify all substrate dyes or inks.
Independently tested absence or no dyes with verified material list.
Plastic-free cloth alone is not a phthalate test.
Independently verified absence or complete formula/material evidence.
See product-specific verification record and its scope.
Multiple strong product-level independent certifications/tests.
99.4% water, sodium benzoate, hydroxyacetophenone, decyl glucoside, polyaminopropyl biguanide. Plastic-free cloth and solar-powered factory are brand claims.
Full formulation/component list with functions or composition.
The brand has independent finalist/curation recognition in the broader range, but exact wipe award evidence is limited.
Exact product is top-rated/wins with one recognised source and has a second independent curation signal, or receives strong positive curation from 2+ sources.
Reviewers praise moisture and effective cleaning for everyday nappy and face messes. A long-term user reports easier wipe removal after the packaging changed, suggesting dispensing has improved for at least some users. Earlier clumping complaints concern older packaging.
Confidence: Medium. Current product details and relevant parent comments are useful, but conflicting review totals and packaging changes limit comparisons.
The brand describes a textured cloth; exact Pure Water parent comments give little detail about tearing or stretching.
Independent comparative result.
The brand’s Pure Water page was used instead of transferring reviews of Probiotic or Aloe & Chamomile wipes. Its visible review dates and current-pack matching are incomplete; one packaging-improvement report is not a controlled test.
Pure Water parents praise wetness and effective cleaning of nappy messes and faces.
Strong comparative testing and reviews.
The brand’s Pure Water page was used instead of transferring reviews of Probiotic or Aloe & Chamomile wipes. Its visible review dates and current-pack matching are incomplete; one packaging-improvement report is not a controlled test.
A long-term Pure Water reviewer reports easier extraction after a packaging change. This updates, but does not definitively resolve, historical clumping concerns.
Strong one-at-a-time/closure evidence and reviews.
The brand’s Pure Water page was used instead of transferring reviews of Probiotic or Aloe & Chamomile wipes. Its visible review dates and current-pack matching are incomplete; one packaging-improvement report is not a controlled test.
Plastic-free cloth and solar-powered factory are brand claims.
Substrate assessment; see current material description.
High quantified renewable share.
Single-use waste remains even without plastic cloth.
Reusable/high displacement of single-use waste.
Biodegradability is conditional; no routine landfill outcome assumed.
Precise, evidence-backed disposal limitations and pathways.
Pack recyclability depends on accepted local facilities.
Verified compostable/reusable or high-recycled-content recyclable packaging.
Brand states a solar-powered factory; audited energy data not retrieved.
Independently reported 100% renewable electricity at relevant manufacturing sites.
No quantified product manufacturing-impact data located.
Public product LCA or independently assured impact metrics.
Material origins and supplier traceability are not detailed in the reviewed information.
Full product-material provenance and supplier/chain identifiers are documented across all relevant inputs. None of this catalogue is assigned 10 on current records.
Verified listing; local store stock varies.
Availability based on current Australian retailer presence: Coles; Chemist Warehouse. Detailed support for this criterion is limited.
Broad major-retailer availability.
Complete a source-by-source audit for 'Retail availability and purchase convenience' for Tooshies wipes, including product-level evidence and relevant testing or certification.
The premium over budget wipes is worthwhile only if the product’s cleaning and skin tolerance suit your family. Cost per usable change is more informative than price per pack. Observed AUD 5.5 for 70 (7.86 cents/wipe). Check live price and bulk packs.
AUD 5.5 / 70 wipes = AUD 0.0786 per wipe, observed 2026-10-02. Location and promotions vary.
Among lowest relevant current prices.
Editorial value assessment considers unit cost and practical cleaning/dispensing evidence.
Excellent performance-to-price or strong lifetime economics.
* Benchmarks describe the scoring rubric, not a guarantee of safety or suitability. Read them alongside the product’s findings and limitations.
Current formula and claim scope reviewed. Independent reports, current price and current-formula parent evidence remain incomplete where noted.
Product evidence last reviewed: 2026-10-23
General plastics research
These studies explain the wider research behind materials assessment. They do not test this product or establish its safety, chemical content or exposure.