Wipes
A low-cost, easy-to-buy fragrance-free wipe with encouraging feedback on moisture and cleaning. The main compromise is pulling out one sheet at a time. A biodegradable label does not mean it can be flushed or that a soiled wipe belongs in home compost.
What these scores mean and how we assess them
Full retailer formula is available. No broader finished-wipe chemical test report was located.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Accessible product-level independent PFAS test/certificate.
Obtain exact-product evidence for PFAS absence / testing.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
TCF/no chlorine with clear evidence.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Chlorine and bleaching process.
Fragrance assessment uses the exact range or explicit variant limitation.
Complete formula plus explicit absence or independently verified absence.
Drying-alcohol assessment distinguishes ethanol/isopropanol from other ingredients with alcohol in their name.
Independently verified absence or complete formulation/material list plus explicit alcohol-free claim.
Assessed from current formula or explicit declaration.
Complete formula or independently verified absence.
Assessed from current formula; presence alone is not a clinical risk conclusion.
Complete formula and explicit phenoxyethanol absence, or product testing covers phenols.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Product/residue testing or robust certified organic coverage.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Pesticide residue risk in plant-derived inputs.
Formula/declaration evidence is separate from analytical testing.
Accessible testing/certification plus absence.
Formula disclosure does not certify all substrate dyes or inks.
Independently tested absence or no dyes with verified material list.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Independently verified absence or complete formula/material evidence.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Phthalate-free.
No specific public evidence located; this is an evidence gap, not proof of chemical presence.
Multiple strong product-level independent certifications/tests.
Obtain exact-product evidence for Independent skin/material safety verification.
Water, cleansing agents, aloe, chamomile, sodium benzoate, propylene glycol, citric acid, panthenol, vitamin E. Exact cloth/plastic proportion unclear. ASTM D5511 claim does not establish ordinary-landfill performance.
Full formulation/component list with functions or composition.
No exact-product low-tox retailer recommendation or award was confirmed.
Exact product is top-rated/wins with one recognised source and has a second independent curation signal, or receives strong positive curation from 2+ sources.
Parents naming CUB fragrance-free wipes praise thickness, balanced moisture and effective cleaning. Dispensing is the main trade-off: some find the sheets easy to separate, while others report several coming out together. Skin tolerance is often reported positively.
Confidence: Medium. Exact fragrance-free comments support the assessment; the broader review pool includes other CUB variants.
Fragrance-free users describe a thick, durable cloth that withstands cleaning without easily tearing.
Independent comparative result.
Mouths of Mums combines lightly scented, fragrance-free and some Premium Thick & Soft comments. Only explicit fragrance-free or clearly scoped reports inform this assessment; sponsored-trial context and current-pack uncertainty remain.
Explicit fragrance-free reviews describe effective cleaning and a useful middle ground between too wet and too dry.
Strong comparative testing and reviews.
Mouths of Mums combines lightly scented, fragrance-free and some Premium Thick & Soft comments. Only explicit fragrance-free or clearly scoped reports inform this assessment; sponsored-trial context and current-pack uncertainty remain.
Extraction reports conflict: some users find sheets separate easily; an explicitly fragrance-free review reports a string of several wipes coming out together.
Strong one-at-a-time/closure evidence and reviews.
Mouths of Mums combines lightly scented, fragrance-free and some Premium Thick & Soft comments. Only explicit fragrance-free or clearly scoped reports inform this assessment; sponsored-trial context and current-pack uncertainty remain.
Exact cloth/plastic proportion unclear. ASTM D5511 claim does not establish ordinary-landfill performance.
Substrate assessment; see current material description.
High quantified renewable share.
Single-use waste remains even without plastic cloth.
Reusable/high displacement of single-use waste.
ASTM D5511 claim is laboratory-condition evidence, not verified real-world landfill degradation.
Precise, evidence-backed disposal limitations and pathways.
Pack recyclability depends on accepted local facilities.
Verified compostable/reusable or high-recycled-content recyclable packaging.
No manufacturing renewable-energy percentage located.
Independently reported 100% renewable electricity at relevant manufacturing sites.
No quantified product manufacturing-impact data located.
Public product LCA or independently assured impact metrics.
Material origins and supplier traceability are not detailed in the reviewed information.
Full product-material provenance and supplier/chain identifiers are documented across all relevant inputs. None of this catalogue is assigned 10 on current records.
Verified listing; local store stock varies.
Availability based on current Australian retailer presence: Coles. Detailed support for this criterion is limited.
Broad major-retailer availability.
Complete a source-by-source audit for 'Retail availability and purchase convenience' for CUB wipes, including product-level evidence and relevant testing or certification.
The observed unit price supports a strong budget case. That saving still depends on how many wipes you use and whether they suit your baby; a biodegradability claim does not by itself establish better cleaning or lower overall impact. Observed AUD 2 for 80 (2.50 cents/wipe). Check live price and bulk packs.
AUD 2 / 80 wipes = AUD 0.0250 per wipe, observed 2026-10-02. Location and promotions vary.
Among lowest relevant current prices.
Editorial value assessment considers unit cost and practical cleaning/dispensing evidence.
Excellent performance-to-price or strong lifetime economics.
* Benchmarks describe the scoring rubric, not a guarantee of safety or suitability. Read them alongside the product’s findings and limitations.
Current formula and claim scope reviewed. Independent reports, current price and current-formula parent evidence remain incomplete where noted.
Product evidence last reviewed: 2026-10-23
General plastics research
These studies explain the wider research behind materials assessment. They do not test this product or establish its safety, chemical content or exposure.