Nestivo

Quokka Beds Cot Mattress

Cot mattresses

Nestivo’s take

Natural fillings and a reversible infant/toddler design are the main attractions. The price is high, and it needs a protector and spot-cleaning rather than a washable core. Infant-sleep firmness needs confirming before use; organic materials alone do not settle that question.

Compare Quokka Beds Cot Mattress

Mattress size & cot fit

Published mattress dimensions: 130 × 69 × 10 cm. The filter uses the cot’s specified mattress footprint; it does not substitute a generic gap allowance or accept a smaller mattress merely because it fits inside.

Dimensions shortlist options; actual fit, firmness, condition and manufacturer approval still need checking.

Manufacturer dimension source · Dimensions checked 2026-10-31

Scores at a glance

What these scores mean and how we assess them

Low toxins
59 / 100
Performance
67 / 100
Sustainability
61 / 100
Availability
45 / 100
Price / value
32 / 100

Why parents choose it

What to think twice about

Evidence behind the scores

Low toxins — 59 / 100

Quokka lists GOTS organic coir, cotton and wool plus GOLS Dunlop latex, without conventional foam or stated added flame retardants. The page says the firmness approach is informal/in-house or based on a supplier book method, so Nestivo does not treat this as independent firmness verification.

Material composition and potentially concerning inputs

Published materials: GOTS coir/cotton/wool and GOLS Dunlop latex according to the brand.

Score: 10 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Full layer/material disclosure.

VOC / odour / emissions disclosure

Natural-input and dual-sided design claims; independent public firmness report not located. No full finished-product VOC/emissions report was located in the reviewed public source.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Recognised low-emission testing/certification.

A product-specific emissions or VOC test report was not found.

Formaldehyde, adhesive and binder disclosure

Natural-input and dual-sided design claims; independent public firmness report not located. Public disclosure is limited to what the brand describes; Nestivo did not infer absence of formaldehyde, adhesives or binders where it was not stated.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Product-level testing/certification.

Product-specific information on adhesives, binders and formaldehyde remains incomplete.

Flame-retardant treatment disclosure

Natural-input and dual-sided design claims; independent public firmness report not located. No chemical-treatment absence is assumed where the page does not say so.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Clear no-added-flame-retardant evidence plus materials.

Whether flame-retardant treatments are used remains unconfirmed.

Independent material, certification or standards evidence

GOTS organic fibres and GOLS latex (brand-published input claims). Quokka identifies GOTS organic coir/cotton/wool and GOLS Dunlop latex. Nestivo did not locate public certificate numbers for the finished mattress, so these are recorded as named material-input claims rather than finished-product certification.

Score: 6 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Multiple relevant product-level certifications/tests.

The certificate number, current validity and product coverage remain unconfirmed.

Ingredient/material disclosure completeness

GOTS coir/cotton/wool and GOLS Dunlop latex according to the brand. Natural-input and dual-sided design claims; independent public firmness report not located.

Score: 10 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Full formulation/component list with functions or composition.

Performance — 67 / 100

Owner comments are positive about build quality, and the two-sided design allows an infant-to-toddler transition. Spot-cleaning is the practical drawback compared with a washable-core mattress. Infant use requires the specified infant side.

Confidence: Low. Product details and owner comments are useful, but firmness is supported by an in-house check rather than an independently retrieved test.

Firmness and safe-sleep suitability

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry. ACCC safe-sleep guidance emphasises using the size and thickness designed for the cot and a firm, flat, level surface. Small self-selected sample across several years. Perceived firm feel is not a laboratory firmness result; future reuse intentions are not observed durability.

Score: 7 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Firm, flat surface supported by applicable evidence.

Correct cot fit and size availability

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry. Small self-selected sample across several years. Perceived firm feel is not a laboratory firmness result; future reuse intentions are not observed durability.

Score: 8 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Exact sizing and fit guidance.

Edge support and shape retention

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry. The source does not provide a standardised edge-compression result unless stated. Small self-selected sample across several years. Perceived firm feel is not a laboratory firmness result; future reuse intentions are not observed durability.

Score: 6 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Strong edge/support evidence.

Current-model edge-support tests have not been confirmed.

Cleanability and moisture management

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry. Small self-selected sample across several years. Perceived firm feel is not a laboratory firmness result; future reuse intentions are not observed durability.

Score: 4 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Removable washable cover plus strong moisture management.

Durability and warranty

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry. Small self-selected sample across several years. Perceived firm feel is not a laboratory firmness result; future reuse intentions are not observed durability.

Score: 8 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Long warranty and strong durability evidence.

Independent long-term durability evidence remains limited.

Sustainability — 61 / 100

Named organic/certified natural inputs and a two-stage design are meaningful strengths. Nestivo did not locate a product-specific take-back route, packaging detail, quantified lifecycle study or public certificate identifiers.

Renewable / plant-based material share

Named certified natural inputs; no product-level take-back, packaging or LCA evidence located.

Score: 10 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

High quantified renewable share.

Durability and reuse lifespan

69 x 130 x 10 cm; firm infant side / medium toddler side; spot clean and air dry.

Score: 8 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Long size range, robust materials, warranty/repair data and reuse evidence.

End-of-life evidence and disposal honesty

Named certified natural inputs; no product-level take-back, packaging or LCA evidence located. No Australian end-of-life collection or recovery outcome is assumed without published evidence.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Precise, evidence-backed disposal limitations and pathways.

An Australian take-back or recovery option was not found.

Manufacturing powered by renewable energy

Named certified natural inputs; no product-level take-back, packaging or LCA evidence located. No mattress-specific renewable-energy percentage was located unless explicitly published.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Independently reported 100% renewable electricity at relevant manufacturing sites.

The mattress factory’s electricity sources and renewable-energy share are not disclosed.

Manufacturing impact / lifecycle evidence

Named certified natural inputs; no product-level take-back, packaging or LCA evidence located.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Public product LCA or independently assured impact metrics.

A product lifecycle assessment or independently verified impact figures were not found.

Packaging sustainability

No product-specific packaging sustainability evidence was located in the reviewed public source unless explicitly stated.

Score: 3 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Verified compostable/reusable or high-recycled-content recyclable packaging.

Packaging composition and suitable disposal options are not fully disclosed.

Sourcing transparency

The brand names GOTS organic fibre and GOLS latex inputs; certificate identifiers and covered components remain unconfirmed.

Score: 7 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Full product-material provenance and supplier/chain identifiers are documented across all relevant inputs. None of this catalogue is assigned 10 on current records.

Availability — 45 / 100

Sold direct online, with free delivery and Perth pickup described by the brand; not broadly stocked.

Retail availability and purchase convenience

Direct online; free delivery/Perth pickup stated.

Score: 5 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Broad major-retailer availability.

Price / value — 32 / 100

Listed at $690. The material profile may justify the premium for some families, but it is one of the least accessible choices by upfront cost.

Typical unit / upfront price

$690 listed price.

Score: 2 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Among lowest relevant current prices.

Confirm the current live price; promotions and custom quotes change.

Value for performance / lifetime cost

$690 listed price. Value is Nestivo’s relative assessment of published price, warranty, design and evidence; it is not a claim that one choice suits every family.

Score: 5 / 10
What earns 10/10?*

Excellent performance-to-price or strong lifetime economics.

Value changes with price, fit, cot compatibility and family needs.

* Benchmarks describe the scoring rubric, not a guarantee of safety or suitability. Read them alongside the product’s findings and limitations.

Sources & evidence confidence

Quokka publishes detailed natural materials and named GOTS/GOLS inputs, along with dimensions and two-sided design. The firmness check is described as informal/in-house or supplier-book based rather than a retrieved independent laboratory report, and certificate identifiers were not located.

Product evidence last reviewed: 2026-10-08

General plastics research

These studies explain the wider research behind materials assessment. They do not test this product or establish its safety, chemical content or exposure.